8月1日晚上，一条新闻把网球圈搅成了沸沸扬扬的一锅粥。
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin JianThe "Enemy State Clauses" is an important provision of the UN Charter. As we mark 80 years of the Tokyo Trials, to reaffirm these clauses and underline their binding force is of particular importance for defending the outcomes of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War and thwarting the resurrection of militarism, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday.
On Monday, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov told the media that Japan was initially designated as an "enemy state" in the UN Charter. He sincerely hoped that Japan read the Charter in its entirety, including Article 107, namely the "Enemy State Clauses." Japan joined the UN after having atoned for its militaristic policies and the crimes it committed. By joining the UN, Japan recognized the principles enshrined in the Charter in their entirety. If the Japanese leaders are attempting to violate their own Constitution, rewrite international law, and evade historical responsibility, it will naturally give rise to serious concern.
In response, Lin said that "China agrees with what Foreign Minister Lavrov said."
Lin noted that Japan needs to be reminded that instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, stipulate Japan's international obligations as a defeated country and serve as cornerstones of the postwar international order. Fulfilling these obligations is the political and legal prerequisite for Japan to be readmitted to the international community.
"Today, however, the Takaichi administration keeps sidestepping the issue of historical crimes with no sign of remorse, and even goes to great lengths to whitewash and glorify them, as part of its scheme to abandon pacifism, break free from the constraints of its Constitution and domestic and international laws, and ratchet up remilitarization," Lin said.
"This is a blatant challenge to the postwar international order and a flagrant provocation to peace and justice. All peace-loving nations need to jointly reject and check Japanese right-wing forces' dangerous pursuit so as to safeguard the outcomes of WWII victory and the postwar international order and ensure that the tragedies of history will never be repeated," Lin said.
Global Times
。2026比利·简·金杯深圳总决赛中国队名单公布：队长郑洁，队员郑钦文、王曦雨、张帅、郭涵煜、蒋欣玗——唯独没有王欣瑜。消息一出，评论区直接炸了。
二 | 道理似乎明摆着：本赛季状态和排名都更靠前的，明明是王欣瑜。她现在是国内单打排名第一，稳居世界前40；而被选中的郑钦文，伤愈复出后多站赛事起伏不定，积分滑落到百名开外，正处在公认的"低谷期"。放着排名第一的选手不用，去带一个排名一百开外的，这选拔标准到底是按什么排的？于是，"有内幕"的猜测像野草一样疯长——是不是论资排辈？是不是看名气？是不是谁人气高谁上？王欣瑜自己的反应，反而把局面推到了更微妙的位置。她在社交媒体上写："无法在家乡参加比利·简·金杯决赛，这让我感到意外。代表国家参赛一直是我的首要任务。我尊重这一决定，也感到失望。我的初心不变，未来我会继续努力。"一个球员用"意外"来形容落选，本身就说明她自己也没想到。这下外界更来劲了：连当事人都觉得意外，那这名单到底怎么定出来的？说实话，我完全理解这种愤怒。从"谁状态好谁上"的朴素逻辑看，王欣瑜确实更该进。她这一年的硬仗打得比谁都多，排名是实打实打出来的，凭什么要让位给一个刚刚伤愈、还在找手感的人？这种质疑，不是无理取闹，是球迷对"公平"最本能的期待。但我也想泼一盆冷静的水：团体赛的名单，从来不是排排行榜。郑洁是谁？是身高不到一米六五、带着严重脚踝伤站上温网领奖台的大满贯女双冠军。她不是循规蹈矩的人，当年打球就认准方向绝不回头。
三 | 这次顶着"放着排名第一的选手不用"的骂声调整阵容，恰恰是她作为队长最果断的地方——她比谁都清楚，去年对阵意大利，中国队到底是输在了哪。回想去年深圳春茧那场四分之一决赛，至今是很多球迷的意难平：袁悦对阵科恰雷托，第二盘5-2领先、手握3个盘点，却被连追5局逆转；王欣瑜面对保利尼，首盘先声夺人，第二盘抢七拿到盘点后被翻盘，决胜盘领先也没守住。两场球，两次在领先局面下被翻盘。中国队不是实力不如对手，而是在意大利人最擅长的缠斗节奏里，把胜利主动权一点点交了出去。而意大利队的单打选手，最擅长的就是磨关键分。
四 | 哪怕你拿到盘点，只要没赢下，她们就能把比赛拖进自己的节奏。王欣瑜和袁悦恰恰在去年的硬仗里，暴露了关键分处理急躁、领先局面下体能分配不合理的短板——同样阵容再打一次，很可能重蹈覆辙。
五 | 再看场地。本届赛事是室内硬地，封闭场馆无风干扰，球速更快、弹跳规律稳定，完全不同于室外红土、草地的多变。
六 | 这正是郑钦文的"本命赛场"：她职业生涯硬地胜率高达62%，高于红土的58%和草地的55%。她标志性的暴力平击发球、正手重轰，在室内硬地的快节奏加持下威胁会被成倍放大，根本不给意大利选手擅长的底线缠斗留空间。很多人只盯着她现在排名百名开外，却忘了她在巴黎奥运会一路连克种子、爆冷夺冠的韧性——那种落后局面下完成逆转的大赛气质，恰恰是意大利队最忌惮的特质。更关键的是，只要披上国家队战袍，郑钦文总能爆发出比巡回赛更强的战斗力，团体赛的使命感会把她的上限拉到难以预估的高度。所以你看，郑洁这步棋，赌的不是"现在的排名"，而是"对意大利这一场的克制力"。当然，我也要说句公道话：外界猜"内幕"，本质上伤的是信任。中国网球好不容易靠李娜、郑钦文、王欣瑜这批人把热度做起来，选拔一旦显得不透明，最寒心的是球迷，其次就是球员本人。王欣瑜那句"意外和失望"，值得决策者认真对待——哪怕决定是对的，沟通也可以更充分。让落选的人心服，让入选的人无包袱，这才是强队该有的样子。至于"内幕"——在没有任何实锤之前，那不过是一场情绪的宣泄。真正的答案，八月的深圳见分晓。
七 | （罗掌柜）
